it's like meeting the real Santa. no, wait. I think I'm spelling that wrong.
I used to think you had to volunteer to be belittled in Joe Mallozzi's blog, but apparently they're drafting people now.
You know, I really thought about engaging with him (if only to correct the clear misreading of the last quote he puts up there -- I hope it's obvious to all of you that I didn't mean you could ONLY care about people you'd met, only that you were BOUND to do so, while it's often a lot more hit-or-miss with strangers) -- and then I remembered that we're talking about Joe Mallozzi, and that the reason I don't communicate with him *to start with* is that I think he's an asshole who treats the fans foolish enough to play that game like dirt. That hasn't changed, so I can't see where commenting would do me much good.
But I thought I'd let y'all know I was being talked about over there. It's practically like being famous!
You know, I really thought about engaging with him (if only to correct the clear misreading of the last quote he puts up there -- I hope it's obvious to all of you that I didn't mean you could ONLY care about people you'd met, only that you were BOUND to do so, while it's often a lot more hit-or-miss with strangers) -- and then I remembered that we're talking about Joe Mallozzi, and that the reason I don't communicate with him *to start with* is that I think he's an asshole who treats the fans foolish enough to play that game like dirt. That hasn't changed, so I can't see where commenting would do me much good.
But I thought I'd let y'all know I was being talked about over there. It's practically like being famous!
no subject
Talk about just not getting it.
(Though, yes, I could try and give him the benefit of the doubt regarding he was only reading the point 2nd hand, etc. But no, the 4 years of writing just doesn't support that.)
no subject
no subject
Personal Translation:
"Hi, I'm an asshole who doesn't realize how interconnected the internet is and I like responding to things out of context!"
Really, they had me until they ran with the "let's threaten the pregnant woman!" plot. Please shoot me.
no subject
Of course, that doesn't explain why he's an ass to everyone *else* who wins a cameo in his blog. Also, it doesn't explain why he actually is an incompetent fuckweasel who doesn't know what "colonialism" means. But anyway, I'm just saying, I'd be pissed, too.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Yeah, I dunno either. *g*
no subject
no subject
You know, the weird thing is, I think it would be cool to be able to sit down and talk about stuff like this with a producer. I wouldn't even be a bitch about it! I'd just like to hear about what led them to some of the decisions they made in this season, and where I think some of those decisions totally undermined the story they claim they want to write. This? Is not that, and will never be that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
This is not the first time that I've thought that Joe Mallozzi's blog would be good logical flaw spotting practice for LSAT students. I mean, it's the exact setup of a number of the Logical Reasoning questions: Person A makes an argument, Person B responds with "Clearly you're wrong because...", and the test taker has to identify the way in which Person B is making a total ass of himself. It's deeply amusing to me as a test prep provider to see people demonstrating classic LSAT flaws in real life.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I mean...a brief, yeah, you're totally right. They wouldn't use their resources for plastic lunches. It was easy and convenient for us and we didn't think...But then it takes guts to own up to shit...
no subject
Way to may your point for you.
Mallozzi, do you truly think that your entire audience is fooled into thinking that you don't use craft services to outfit the mess, with the little sandwiches sealed in plastic triangles and the bottled fucking EVIAN, you stupid man?
Yes, it's so damn comfortable Sheppard's bed is too short for him. You can ship thousands of litres of over-packaged teeny bottles of water from galaxy to galaxy, month after month, but a few one-off adult size Ikea flatpacks are completely out of the question. Jesus H Christ. I guess you're where a whole bunch of the stupid in the show comes from.
Do you really think you should use words you don't understand? Words like "reasoning"?
Re: Way to may your point for you.
So it was pretty funny to come home that same night and discover this. *g* Really, this is the best live show in the house since the time Mary got called out on Lee Goldberg's blog!
no subject
Actually, I can.
no subject
no subject
no subject
The poster, markus, said that he was arguing with his sister, who pointed him to hth. He was struck wordless by the force of hth's prose, basically, and went running to JM saying, "but! but! tell her she's wrong!" IOW, "Dad! Dad! Sister's picking on me! And she's a *girl*, girls aren't allowed to win arguments! Beat her up!"
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
Okay, I lurk here and don't comment much, but this just floored me. First off, I almost never post episode reactions these days, because I just wait to read yours, which usually echo my own feelings, but express them much more eloquently. And though you may occasionally rant about the more ridiculous plotlines/moments/aspects, my impression is you, like me, still enjoy watching this show. Dude, it's an entertaining SF show - how many episodes of Star Trek: Choose Your Incarnation did fandom respond to similarly, yet fandom still loved to watch??
Which makes it all the more baffling to me that someone would go to the bother of snipping excerpts and posting them to Mallozzi's blog. I say again, WTF? And where does this person get off? Dude, come up with your own statements, have some fucking balls. "Marko", whoever you are, have a thought of your own, why don't you?
Which brings me to taking things completely out of context - how can Joe know what you meant when Marko is only quoting specific bits, some of them edited specific bits. Reading your post, I clearly understood what you meant about the Athosians and John and Rodney would have known some of them, and thus ought to have cared a lot more than we were shown about the Athosians' disappearance. Somehow, Joe interpreted that to mean you were saying John and Rodney couldn't care about people they'd never met...um, no, sorry there Joe. I actually feel kind of bad for Joe. He sort of got hit upside the head with these incorrectly presented statements, and has responded to what he (incorrectly) perceives them to have meant in a public forum. Great job again, there Marko!
And finally, we of online journaling, especially in fandom, often use our journals to vent our emotions, whether they be high or low, about our favorite things/shows/whatever. Sure, it's public and anyone on the internets can read and comment if they like. But still, it seems extremely invasive to me for someone to do this. If they wanted to point Joe to your entry (ie linking the entire thing) that would be far different than arbitrarily choosing bits and flinging them at Joe out of context. Especially since this person clearly wanted some sort of validation from Joe that they were 'right' and you (and Marko's poor sister, whoever she may be) were 'wrong'. These are opinions, Marko. We all have them, and no two are exactly alike. Get used to it!
If this had happened to me, I'd be royally pissed at the anonymous "Marko". Hell, I am and it didn't happen to me!
no subject
I'm not really pissed about any of it, except maybe that last bit where Mallozzi does a half-assed job of making it sound like I don't believe in human compassion -- rotten logic just on the face of it, and honestly kind of hilarious if you actually read the post and were aware that my whole rant was about the lack of basic human compassion the lead characters show toward the Athosians.
Hey, frankly, if Marko wants to drop me a comment and ask *me* why I would say such things about SGA, I'd be glad to tell him. I'd even be on my best behavior -- I'd be like Lewis Black at the Kennedy Center, a thirty "fuck" maxiumum! I *can* engage in constructive debate and criticism...I just wasn't really aiming at it in that particular post. *g* If it had occurred to me I'd really be on the hook for educating the masses, I'd have done a better job of it, I think!
Actually, the whole thing has given me some insight into one of the basic disconnects that I think is happening: when I talk about "colonialism" and "imperialism," I'm not saying that you can't have *affection* toward people beneath you in the power structure, that you can't worry about them and feel obliged to protect them. In fact, I'd argue that's part and parcel of a colonialist attitude -- that urge to be their Great White Saviors. And I'm not sure everyone gets that; I think for some people, "But John saves the natives all the time!" really is an argument that he's *not* a paternalistic colonizer -- it's really proof of his decency, which of course protects him from all criticism, ever. When in reality, OBVIOUSLY, "But I only want the very best for them!" is excactly how imperialists justify everything they do in colonized territory.
Food for thought, you know? If I ever have a chat with Marko, I might lead off with something along those lines.
(no subject)
no subject
I don't think I've ever dropped you a line, but I lurk in your journal constantly waiting for more Ronon thoughts or fic.
I'm not sure I agree entirely with your text that some weirdo dropped on Mallozzi's blog, but I totally do with your assessment that the whole purpose of his interaction with fans is to repeatedly assert how cool/smart/superior he is.
I'd much rather read your reactions to episodes than his.
no subject
Anyway, my point is, there's no way Mallozzi could have known I was talking about all of that, just from those particular quotes! Let alone responded to any of it, even if he'd wanted to (not that I think he did want to). So, anyway. I'm sorry that those particular pieces of text were asked to stand in for some larger, semi-complicated things that I had to say, because I just don't think they were strong enough sentences to bear as much weight as they were asked to bear.
no subject
Wow. I guess that seals it, he really wouldn't recognize colonialism if he were creating shows 'extolling' it week after week.
O.O
Wow.
Anyway, I friended you as I dig your thoughts on sga and other stuff.
no subject
Thanks for the friending!
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(no subject)
what the hey?
So.
-K
no subject
http://josephmallozzi.wordpress.com/2008/03/05/march-5-2008-congratulations-all-around/
I still can't figure out what he said that misquoted/took your words out of context.
*headscratch*