You might have heard (probably from the Daily Show -- I know you people!) about a major, expensive study done this past year to test the efficacy of so-called healing prayer...you know, the one that was supposed to prove that Good Vibes and Healing Thoughts and God and whatnot helped people come through their surgeries with fewer complications &ctera. And then what the data actually showed was that the people who were prayed for in this study had a slightly but statistically meaningful HIGHER chance of complications.
Yeah. Prayer kills.
I don't know, you have to understand. I am myself a religious person. I pray. But I loathe people who treat their chosen deity like a fucking soda machine: no, God doesn't root for your team, and he had less to do with your Grammy award than your publicist did, and the reason people die on the operating table is not that everybody forgot to pray for them, oops. I'm a religious person. I pray. And like the great philosopher Detective Frank Pembleton once said, God doesn't save anyone; God is in the next town over, creating hurricanes and hunchbacks. I suppose it sounds contradictory, but I'm happy with my theology.
Anyway, this article is a semi-humorous, semi-serious attempt to make sense out of that study's data -- what can we hypothesize about the nature of God now that we maybe didn't know before? I'm personally fond of "God hates form letters" and "God doesn't like to be told what to do," but then, hey, self-projection is the oldest theological tradition known to the species, isn't it? *g*
Yeah. Prayer kills.
I don't know, you have to understand. I am myself a religious person. I pray. But I loathe people who treat their chosen deity like a fucking soda machine: no, God doesn't root for your team, and he had less to do with your Grammy award than your publicist did, and the reason people die on the operating table is not that everybody forgot to pray for them, oops. I'm a religious person. I pray. And like the great philosopher Detective Frank Pembleton once said, God doesn't save anyone; God is in the next town over, creating hurricanes and hunchbacks. I suppose it sounds contradictory, but I'm happy with my theology.
Anyway, this article is a semi-humorous, semi-serious attempt to make sense out of that study's data -- what can we hypothesize about the nature of God now that we maybe didn't know before? I'm personally fond of "God hates form letters" and "God doesn't like to be told what to do," but then, hey, self-projection is the oldest theological tradition known to the species, isn't it? *g*
no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 08:27 am (UTC)From:Also, of Rabi'a (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabia_Basri#The_Tale_of_Torch_and_Water), whose example I try to emulate when I think about the divine.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:57 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 08:38 am (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 05:57 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-09 02:46 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:06 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 12:24 am (UTC)From:A subset of humanity has psychic healing powers, and some of these were included in the group of prayer-givers. Of course, their powers are weak and untrained, so having them keep the patients "in mind" has about the same effect has having them throw tiny bottles of penicillin at the patients. What is needed is a Charles Xavier to show these folks how to make it work.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-10 06:08 pm (UTC)From:no subject
Date: 2007-01-12 07:14 pm (UTC)From:Came to your LJ about some of your Dex fic and saw this and had to comment.
I have to shake my head at the whole "health and wealth" gospel concept. Not to say that God can't or won't heal you or make you wealthy or whatever, but he's got his own agenda and it's bigger than we can even begin to conceive of, let alone understand, and to claim we can work him like some sort of a slot machine is just offensive.