Out of the goodness of my heart, I am now willing to stipulate that maybe it was said out of a thoughtless assumption that non-lawyers would interpret the statement the way lawyers do. Or maybe my definition is the skewed one, but it certainly wouldn't have occurred to me that when something goes to a civil instead of a criminal court, it's because the offense wasn't a crime.
Anyway, I'm just so tired of bogus explanations as to why X isn't what we think it is because now we're calling it something totally different (it's enhanced! it's a horizon!) that my nerves are clearly on edge. *g*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 12:12 am (UTC)From:Anyway, I'm just so tired of bogus explanations as to why X isn't what we think it is because now we're calling it something totally different (it's enhanced! it's a horizon!) that my nerves are clearly on edge. *g*
no subject
Date: 2008-08-21 12:42 am (UTC)From:FUCK YOU TIL THE END OF TIME, NEW YORK TIMES!